Abortion disproves Atheism and Darwinism.

stfuconservatives:

les-baleines:

stfuconservatives:

sugaredvenom:

andigreyscale:

significantlyunknown:

crosspreacher:

(snipped)

Oh my god what.

Lol what the hell did I just read?

And speak for yourself OP, I don’t experience lust. 

And I don’t like kids.

So…. phht.

AHAHAHAHAHAAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAA

…The fact that people with uteruses don’t want to be pregnant or have a baby all the time disproves evolution. WOW. New low? By this logic, homosexuality also disproves evolution, as does the fact that human beings outlive their reproductive systems. It’s almost like… like… like people have some purpose in life other than bearing spawn? That people have ambitions and goals and being pregnant RIGHT THIS MINUTE doesn’t gel with them? That evolution, while a scientifically proven and concise theory as to the origin of our species and every other species on the planet, doesn’t presume to explain every motivation every human has?

FOR FUCK’S SAKE CHRISTIANS, IT’S LIKE YOU’RE NOT EVEN TRYING ANYMORE.

Oh look, a use for that reaction gif.

Seriously, OP, we have a worldwide population of seven BILLION human beings and you think some of them deciding to have abortions disproves evolutionism and natural selection?  Setting aside the fact that, in the U.S. at least, most women who have abortions have already had kids - setting aside the fact that the population is still growing on a global scale - did no one ever teach you in high school that ecology/evolution is a theory applied to populations, not to individuals?  Scale matters.  As in any scientific field, a larger data pool minimizes the effects of aberrations on the results - in this case, those aberrations are people who, for whatever reason, don’t want to reproduce.  But the broader trend, population-wide, still upholds the theory.

TL;DR you don’t know jack shit about science.

(via stfuconservatives)

  1. brassbuddy reblogged this from stfuconservatives
  2. redhairandabluebox reblogged this from stfuconservatives and added:
    Uugggh as a science person this pisses me off SO HARD Darwinism isn’t just about sexual selection (ability to reproduce,...
  3. forumgamer reblogged this from stfuconservatives
  4. calayna reblogged this from stfuconservatives
  5. nomadicdreamer reblogged this from stfuconservatives and added:
    ohh love that science sizzle
  6. shimanatalia reblogged this from stfuconservatives
  7. kenzie-neverland reblogged this from cosmicrubric
  8. cosmicrubric reblogged this from deliciouskaek
  9. bitterseafigtree reblogged this from aka14kgold
  10. easterlily-92 reblogged this from aka14kgold
  11. aka14kgold reblogged this from deliciouskaek
  12. coorio reblogged this from deliciouskaek
  13. cand86 reblogged this from impuretale and added:
    Did someone forget that animals sometimes use hormonal birth control, engage in sperm ejection, and self-abort?
  14. kimbrelly reblogged this from scooterpiebanana
  15. seaghostsoaring reblogged this from scooterpiebanana
  16. deliciouskaek reblogged this from scooterpiebanana and added:
    What kills me is that instead of using that massive brain trust to invent new and exciting reasons abortion is evil, why...
  17. gauvaindecourfeyrac reblogged this from scooterpiebanana
  18. zada2011 reblogged this from sparkylurkdragon
  19. sparkylurkdragon reblogged this from stfuconservatives
  20. saffrondawn reblogged this from stfuconservatives
  21. thethousandthcat reblogged this from stfuconservatives
  22. goldelinemydear reblogged this from piddlebucket
  23. operationmove reblogged this from sadhag
  24. thereisnosaintellen reblogged this from hamiltonkitty
  25. grifsballs reblogged this from stfuconservatives
  26. lostpoeticethic reblogged this from you-should-have-choices and added:
    Forever reblog.
  27. professorbeast reblogged this from stfuconservatives
  28. javerts-jabear reblogged this from stfuconservatives
  29. strawberryfields5evr reblogged this from stfuconservatives
  30. pantylion reblogged this from fib
  31. starrry-starry-night reblogged this from fib
If you know me, then you can probably describe me better than I can describe myself. If not, than you'll just have to piece it together.

view archive



Any questions?

Submit