Blog with a Thousand Faces

Abortion disproves Atheism and Darwinism.

stfuconservatives:

les-baleines:

stfuconservatives:

sugaredvenom:

andigreyscale:

significantlyunknown:

crosspreacher:

(snipped)

Oh my god what.

Lol what the hell did I just read?

And speak for yourself OP, I don’t experience lust. 

And I don’t like kids.

So…. phht.

AHAHAHAHAHAAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAA

…The fact that people with uteruses don’t want to be pregnant or have a baby all the time disproves evolution. WOW. New low? By this logic, homosexuality also disproves evolution, as does the fact that human beings outlive their reproductive systems. It’s almost like… like… like people have some purpose in life other than bearing spawn? That people have ambitions and goals and being pregnant RIGHT THIS MINUTE doesn’t gel with them? That evolution, while a scientifically proven and concise theory as to the origin of our species and every other species on the planet, doesn’t presume to explain every motivation every human has?

FOR FUCK’S SAKE CHRISTIANS, IT’S LIKE YOU’RE NOT EVEN TRYING ANYMORE.

Oh look, a use for that reaction gif.

Seriously, OP, we have a worldwide population of seven BILLION human beings and you think some of them deciding to have abortions disproves evolutionism and natural selection?  Setting aside the fact that, in the U.S. at least, most women who have abortions have already had kids - setting aside the fact that the population is still growing on a global scale - did no one ever teach you in high school that ecology/evolution is a theory applied to populations, not to individuals?  Scale matters.  As in any scientific field, a larger data pool minimizes the effects of aberrations on the results - in this case, those aberrations are people who, for whatever reason, don’t want to reproduce.  But the broader trend, population-wide, still upholds the theory.

TL;DR you don’t know jack shit about science.

(via stfuconservatives)